While I acknowledge that labels are inherently reductive, I align with the descriptors of Xenofeminist, Post-Structuralist, and Accelerationist. These terms encapsulate my beliefs of deconstructing normative paradigms and challenging the spectacle.
I gravitate toward the macabre, not as an aesthetic indulgence, but as a means of dissection. The grotesque, the uncanny, and the sublime are not mere abstractions but instruments that expose the fractures in perception, forcing an examination of what lurks beneath assumed order. An examination of ourselves, and our beliefs.
Dark literature, especially works that engage with suffering, violence, and abuse, is neither corrupt nor excess. It is a confrontation with what society refuses to name. These themes are not distortions of reality but reflections of it, unfiltered and stripped of the comforting veil of detachment. To write about them is not to glorify, but to unearth and force the reader into an encounter with what is often buried beneath decorum. Pain, trauma, and the grotesque are not foreign to art; they are its marrow.
I am a computer programmer with proficiency in HTML, JavaScript, C++, and Python.
Beyond my technical expertise, I like to engage in introspective analysis of information structures, semiotics, and the phenomenology of perception. I reject the notion of knowledge as static or hierarchical; I embrace its fluid, evolving nature, conditioned by both material and immaterial forces. To think critically is to recognize the artificiality of all imposed frameworks.
Aesthetically and philosophically, I gravitate toward Goth, and esoteric subcultures. I find beauty in decay and identity in the interplay between dissolution and reconstruction.
While communism is inherently authoritarian, this does not imply support for a bourgeois or state dictatorship, only of the proletariat. I reject the state-capitalist, liberalist, and bourgeois ideological strains of Leninism, along with any form of bourgeois ideological identification. I oppose the vanguardist consolidation of power, the bureaucratic ossification of revolution, and every framework that postures as radical while reproducing capitalist logics.
I am not a Leninist, a Reformist, a Syndicalist, or an Anarchist. I do not advocate for parliamentary integration, nor do I seek to construct a managerial state under the guise of socialism. I reject the idealist fantasy of spontaneous statelessness, as well as the reactionary impulse to cling to state permanence. I do not believe in gradualist compromise or the recuperation of revolutionary energy into controlled opposition.
While Anarchism rightly critiques the state as an instrument of class rule, its rejection of all transitional structures renders it incapable of substance. The immediate dissolution of the state, absent an alternative power structure, leaves the proletariat vulnerable to counter-revolution and reactionary capture. I do not align with anarchy's voluntarist impulse, which disavows the necessity of an organized revolutionary mechanism. Instead, I hold that the state must be dismantled through systematic negation and not through idealist rejection.
My alignment is closest to Dutch-German Left Communism, which refuses both reformist assimilation and authoritarian statism. I stand for rupture and not for recuperation. I stand for a complete dismantling of capitalist systems.
The world as it stands is a mausoleum of failed revolutions and pacified minds. Capitalism has metabolized dissent into aesthetic. The Spectacle thrives on our alienation, feeding us mediated existence in place of life. They will tell you that reform is possible, that change is slow, that the state can be bent toward justice. They lie. There is no dialogue with power. Power must be shattered.
What you see is not real. What you are shown is an illusion. The Spectacle is not just media; it is the entire engineered perception of reality, the programming of consciousness itself. You are not meant to know yourself, you are meant to be a commodity, a subject, a passive participant in your own subjugation.
Technology has been captured by capital, twisted into an instrument of discipline, of surveillance, of control. But it is not inherently oppressive, it is a field of potential, waiting to be liberated. We reject the fetishization of the organic, the belief that the human body must remain as it is, that identity is rooted in flesh and tradition. There is nothing natural about gender. There is nothing natural about suffering. There is nothing natural about oppression.
You were raised to believe in permanence, in stability, in the legitimacy of the institutions that govern your life. You were told that history is progress, that the world as it stands is the product of rationality and inevitability.
This is false.
We will tear down what they call "rational." We will obliterate what they call "truth."
I reject the notion of absolute objectivity, truth is ever in flux and all things are a continuous evolution shaped by language, experience, and the interplay of ideas.
Information, in its most elemental form, is a representation, a dynamic abstract movement that defies any rigid centralized organization.
Understanding begins with criticality, a free subjective analysis that stands opposite to dogma. Our perceptions are conditioned by experience and the flow of information must first be filtered through our senses and unconsciously digested before it can spark conscious insight.
Information’s potential, its inherent power, and ideas’ fluidity can only be fully realized through a process of ongoing critique and re-evaluation.
Collection of 1000 webpages all accessed through an HTML terminal based operating system
11% Complete